Monday, 31 October, 2011

Loss



The decline of western man contained within two quotes:
“Only in recent times has aristocracy, like royalty, taken on a mere secular and political character. In the beginning, aristocracy and royalty were based on character, race, honor, velour, and faithfulness, on noblesse d’epee and on noblesse de coeur. In later times a plebeian view of the aristocracy arose that denied even the privileges of blood and tradition.” – Evola, Julius

“The ritual and sacral element was the foundation of the authority of both the higher castes and of the father in the ancient patrician family. In Western Aryan societies such as Greece and Rome, the pater familiae originally enjoyed a status similar to that of the priest-king. The term pater was synonymous with the king (hence the words rex, αναξ, βασιλευς); it conveyed the idea of spiritual authority as well as that of power and majestic dignity. 
According to some views with which I totally concur, the state is an application on a larger scale of the same principle that in the beginning constituted a patrician family. Therefore the pater, though he was the military leader and the lord of justice of his relatives and slaves, in primis et ante omnia was the person entrusted with performing those traditional rites and sacrifices proper to every family, the rites and sacrifices that constituted its nonhuman legacy.” – Evola, Julius

A modern disconnect, a sense of disillusionment, a disrespect for all and everything, including of one’s own self, a loss of dignity, a decline towards feminine earthiness, with promiscuity and animalistic instincts unleashed upon the world, all revealed.
A shallow and empty spirituality finding enlightenment in self-hating depravity and superficial idolatry.
The deterioration of the masculine spirit is accompanied with the slow extinction of the pater, the father figure, the connector to one’s entire family legacy and to the spiritual realm which seeks to break free from its earthly bonds.
The masculine spirit strives to rise above, to overcome, to fly upwards towards a projected divinity, an ideal, and its loss constitutes a decline towards the soil, the instinctive the hedonistic, emotional, irrational, and materialistic, the feminine.

Have not some females belonging to the extremes, those more masculine types or those of such profound femininity that the loss is experienced as a feeling of abandonment, have begun to sense the absence.
They cannot fully rationalize it, for they are still stuck in modernistic ploys and pretenses, but they sense it on a visceral level.
As usual they try to explain it by finding the easiest path, the path of least resistance, and they put the blame on the very males they’ve rejected for not living up to their expectations and their modernistic New Age ideals. They defend the very principles that emasculate males and then complain about the absence of any “real” ones.
Where are all the fathers?
Where are all the men who were representatives of their family and their entire bloodline; those who accepted accountability for the entirety?

Emasculated; forced to take over the roles women wish to escape because they’ve been made to feel ashamed of them.

Know Thyself…but how can you know yourself when you’ve cut yourself off from the very ones who can connect you to who and what you are?
What is this New Age self you play at?
A modern man, a metrosexual, cooing and teasing and flexing; a modern woman, a hypermasculine female, wearing the uniforms to pretend she is what she can never be.
Caricatures of a lost inheritance.  

Who are you if not your entire past?
What are you instead now that you have detached yourself from it?
Your job?
Are you your belongings and your properties?
Are you your tits and ass, your engorged cock?
Is that all you are, modern man? Are you that simple?
What is this “self” who search for in nothingness, in emptiness, in projected absolutes or in future possibilities?

When you’ve lost that masculine upward thrust, towards flight, you settle upon a blind and deaf mother earth and all you can see is determined by your miniscule height.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Speaking of the women, the weaker sex, want to see something funny? Check out this video of one of the strongest women in the world getting her ass handed to her by 2 average sized men in arm-wrestling:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS2VTJs1Jus

You can check out her wikipedia bio here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jill_Mills

Her name is Jill Mills and she is undefeated in powerlifting competitions against other women. No woman has ever been able to beat her in any strength competition. Now watch how she does in this arm-wrestling match against these 2 average sized men. The last guy in this video only weighs a measly 155 lbs and yet he dominates her with ease before she resorts to... cheating (the only way women can usually win). The funny thing is, she's roided up like crazy and has spent her entire life working out only to be defeated by 2 bums who are nowhere near being among the strongest men in the world, one of which is a pathetic 155 lbs! Lol! How embarrassing that must have been. This wanna-be alpha female - one of the physically strongest women on earth - was neutered, emasculated and reduced to a beta female bitch by a 155 lb man. LOL!

Anonymous said...

It's funny how whenever you mention to women that men are physically a lot stronger, a typical response from them will be something like, "Have you ever seen female bodybuilders???" And I'm just thinking to myself, "Yeah. And have you seen the world's strongest woman get neutered by a 155 lb man in arm-wrestling match?" LOL. No, you obviously haven't. It's especially funny when they mention bodybuilders since bodybuilders work out mostly size, not strength, while power-lifters and strongmen/women work out more for strength and a 1-rep max. Bodybuilders use lighter weights but do a lot more reps which makes their muscles bigger, making them appear a lot stronger than they actually are. They are stronger than average, of course, but they not as strong as they look. Someone who only did bodybuilding (like most bodybuilders) would be much easier to beat than someone who did powerlifting or strongman/woman training, or all 3 (powerlifting, bodybuilding & strongman/woman training). The woman in the video did all three.

Most of the videos you see of women winning against men at arm-wrestling (or just about anything else), the women only "win" because the men go easy on them (because they are weak, delicate females who need to be pampered and babied, and men need to be chivalrous knights in shining armor who bow down to the almighty pussy), so it upsets them to see a man going full force without holding back. Kind of like how if you're playing against someone like your sister or girlfriend at something like chess, sports, videogames, or anything else, you might go easy on her and let her win because you know how easily you could demolish her if you tried your hardest, and where's the fun in that?

Some of the comments in the video are hilarious too because a lot of the women seem butt-hurt over the fact that the "World's Strongest Woman" lost so easily to 2 average sized men, so they come up with excuses like "she's just a lousy arm-wrestler" or "there's a technical aspect to arm-wrestling that she's just nor familiar with." Hahaha! Things like technique and speed play a role, but strength plays an even bigger role, which is why some of the strongest arm-wrestlers in the world also happen to be some of the strongest men in the world. I guess their vaginas quivered in fear when they realized that one of the strongest women could so easily be dominated by such a small man. They were told in school by their (primarily) female teachers that they were just as strong as the boys. I'm sure even some of those eunuch male teachers told them that they were physically equal.

Some of the femboys seemed upset too, which is even more hilarious. They probably came to that video with a hard on, looking for something to masturbate to, but as soon as those last 2 males started dominating her so easily, their tiny little penises probably went flaccid. I'm sure it was a huge boner kill for those those males.
...

Anonymous said...

A woman would probably come up with study after study after study "proving" that women are just as strong as men, or that men are stronger but only just a little bit, or the ridiculous argument that women are pound-for-pound just as strong or stronger than men...then all I would need to do is post this one video and that's all that would be needed before all of her delusions are shattered and her entire world came crumbling down before her. "I'm a puny little 120 lb woman sitting here behind my computer, and I'm just as strong and tough as a man. Let me go find some studies that prove that we women are just as strong as men. I got dozens of feminist studies here that prove we are."

Hey, I got something for you. Here you go little girl:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS2VTJs1Jus

There's your girl power for you. Yeah, the world's strongest woman couldn't even handle a 155 lb man who isn't even half as strong as the world's strongest man. Ahhh, yes, nothing beats video proof that you can see with your own two eyes. That's better than every study you could ever come up with all combined. Years and years of those so called "studies" thrown down the drain right there. The world's strongest woman defeated with ease by a 155 lb male. Her ovaries have been claimed. Where did all that girl power go? LOL!!! Only in the movies, I guess.

The title of your next blog post should be something like, "The strongest woman in the world gets neutered by a 155 lb man." Then you could have a link to that video and nothing else. Then leave it at the top of the page for at least a few weeks for everyone to see.

Bull Elephant Seal said...

I have this video link on my blog to salute all the tough arm wrestling types out there:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMob-ktxOC4&feature=related

I mean look at those dumb bitches go.

Anonymous said...

I know! It's pretty pathetic how even human males will stoop to such low levels competing for females. A total waste of time and energy. No woman is worth the trouble or effort. Pussy is the most overrated thing on the planet. Overrated, smell and disgusting. I almost puke just thinking about it! Lol! I certainly won't stoop to such low levels competing for females as other males do and I certainly won't let any female have such power over me. I don't get what all the hype is about women and pussy... women are rather boring and simple minded.

Anonymous said...

I found another good one. This one is even better than the first because it's one of the strongest female arm-wrestlers ever losing to a 17 year old boy, thus proving that even a teenage boy who is nowhere near his peak in physical strength can compete with and defeat even the strongest and most elite of women in the world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOkbA0d1Bok

Her name is Heidi Andersson. She is 26 years old in this video and in her physical prime. She won the women's World Championships in arm-wrestling a total of 8 times which is more than any woman ever. Now watch how she gets dominated by this 17 year old 150 lb teenage boy.

Notice how she manages to slam his arm almost all the way down and yet he still manages to bring her arm all the way back to the other direction.

Another wanna-be alpha female neutered and reduced to a beta female bitch... this time by a 17 year old boy. Must have been embarrassing as hell for one of the strongest women arm-wrestlers ever to be defeated by a 150 lb teenage boy. LOL!